Skip to main content

Without Excuse

           The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of people, who suppress the truth by their wickedness, since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse. (Romans 1:18-20)

But it is possible to have an attitude to the external conditions of life only when there is a point of reference outside them. The religions give, or claim to give, such a standpoint, thereby enabling the individual to exercise his judgment and his power of decision. (Jung, C.G., The Undiscovered Self, NY Mentor Books, 1958 pp 29-30.)[1]

We should start with some definitions that won’t fit with the standards. As much as I like definitions, I think these help clarify some muddled post-modern thinking. First, one’s god is whatever one treats as the authority and force behind all that is. It is what causes our universe to function. That is what God is, the Creator of Heaven and Earth, the Lord Most High, our Father, etc. But at the individual level, it’s also true. Our god may not be God. It might be some idol and we may not even know it. But that’s what a god is. It does not have to be a person, place, or thing. It can be an idea or group of ideas.

Next, religion informs how we should relate to the universe, its other inhabitants, and its god, regardless of who or what that god is. The vast majority of people, if asked what informs them about what’s right or wrong, will point to some “self-evident” external something. Some will claim that they, themselves, should be the judge, but they tend not to be so willing to let other people be their own judges. In his consideration and for the purposes of his essay, if the god who decrees the principles of our religion isn’t supernatural (and generally Christian) it is the State, also known as the World. Whatever it is, he says, it must be external to the person to be observable by the person. He goes on to suggest that when the State is our god, one of the primary principles is “You shall have no other gods before me.” This is part of the reason the State tends to claim that “separation of church and state” refers only to the church not being permitted to have any influence on the state, while the state may have unlimited influence on the church.

Dr. Jung said that the only way that the state can function is by treating everyone as a statistic or “clump of statistics”, which denies the individual any individuality or dignity. He notes that the church can do the same thing when the church moves away from what Scripture teaches and begins to act like the state, but the point must be made that the church is not, then, acting according to Scripture but modeling itself after the state. When it is, as Israel did, seeking a king.

In short, Dr. Jung, who was not a Christian and believed himself to be a scientist, agreed with what today’s verse teaches. Man is aware of God, and is without excuse when he rejects God in favor of some other god.



[1] I do not pretend to agree with all of what Dr. Jung claimed, even within this book. It presents, however, some interesting food for thought. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The List

              Therefore, since we have been justified through faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ,   through whom we have gained access by faith into this grace in which we now stand. And we boast in the hope of the glory of God. Not only so, but we also glory in our sufferings, because we know that suffering produces perseverance;   perseverance, character; and character, hope. And hope does not put us to shame, because God’s love has been poured out into our hearts through the Holy Spirit, who has been given to us. (Romans 5:1-5)           Think about it. We have been justified. At least, we could be justified if we stopped insisting that our justification be based on our merits. We have peace with God, or could have peace if we stopped throwing temper tantrums. We have gained access into grace i...

Listen To Him

              The Lord your God will raise up for you a prophet like me from among you, from your fellow Israelites. You must listen to him . (Deuteronomy 18:15)           Today, we switch from Jesus’ claims of “I am” to prophecies made about Him. My Bible platform is starting in Deuteronomy. I’d start in Genesis, where we would learn that the one who would save us would be a descendant of Eve (Genesis 3:15), of Noah (by default), Abram and Sara(Genesis 12:1-3). Isaac (Genesis 17:19), Jacob (Genesis 25:23), Judah (Genesis 29:8), and David (II Samuel 7:12-16). There were also references to a new covenant (Jer. 31:31-34; Ezek. 36:22-32). In addition, there were prophecies about when and where the prophet/Messiah would be born and what would happen to him.           Of course, naysayers will claim that Jesus’ life was retrofitted or reverse enginee...

The Way, The Truth, and The Life

              Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me . (John 14:6)           If “I am the gate of the sheep…I am the good shepherd” from chapter 10 is a double whammy, this verse is a triple whammy. And its first victim is the notion that any other so-called god was acceptable or the same as Jesus. He, and He alone is the way, the truth, and the life, and the only way to get to the Father. There is no other Savior, or Redeemer, according to Jesus. Now, to be fair, other religions will claim that their religion or god(s) are the only way. That is the nature of gods and of religions. If this and that are equally good and agree on what’s necessary, then this and that are the same thing, so there’s no need to from the other to one. If that’s the case, then why speak against the other or promote the one? There’s a song I’ve been listening to i...