For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. (John 3:16) (James 2:19)
You believe that there is one
God. Good! Even the demons believe that—and shudder. (James 2:19)
Now this is eternal life:
that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent.
(John 17:3)
Like just about anything
popular, I’m not fond of this verse. It’s not what it says, I think, as the
sense that so many people seem to treat it so exceptionally. Or maybe part of
it is because it’s one of those all-inclusive verses, and generally when
everyone is included, I feel excluded – one of the herd at best. Perhaps “Everyone”
means extroverts only in my mind. That’s all the more reason why, since my
Bible platform suggested it, I feel the need to discuss it.
So let’s start with the
beginning. God loved the world. There’s no rule saying He had to. I don’t think
He could have created it and declared it bad, but once sin had entered the world,
He could have destroyed it and either not bothered to make another or have
created another. The problem with giving up is that it’s not in His nature. And
had He created another, He would have had to give the people of that world the
same option, and I believe it is inevitable that they would also have fallen.
Others don’t think this is the case, but as long as they were not created as His
equal, the same temptation would occur. If He created them as His equal, He’d
just be creating more of Himself, which really wouldn’t be worthwhile. In addition,
if He didn’t create them with the option of rejecting Him, He would be loving
Himself and not loving them because they would have no freedom. While some may
reject this logic, rejection doesn’t equal refutation.
So God loved the world, and the
world went wrong. He didn’t chuck the whole thing. That would not have been
loving. He didn’t decide to pretend nothing happened or pretend that it was OK.
That wouldn’t have been loving. Love seeks that the beloved be responsible not
in the sense of assigning blame and condemning the beloved, but in the sense of
the beloved taking responsibility because that’s what’s good for the beloved
and shows love on the part of the beloved.
But there was nothing that the
beloved could possibly do to make up for its sins. All sin is treason against
God and is punishable by death. We don’t like to think that way, but that doesn’t
make it otherwise. Nothing the world could do could undo what was done. So, God’s
creation plan (I shudder to think of the stack of blueprints!) included a means
by which God could remain not only a just God, but God at all, and still, at His
own expense, provide the means of justice.
He sent His Son – and no, I don’t
comprehend the Trinity as much as I’d like to or enough to explain it to anyone
- to become one of us, so that by
punishing Him for our crimes, He could be reconciled to us, and us to Him. The
only stipulation regarding the matter is that we accept the reconciliation by accepting
the means by which it was accomplished. It does no good to say, “I believe in Jesus
Christ.” So do the demons, and they shudder. The whole point is that belief requires
action, and that action involves accepting God as God and the means by which He
makes the needed reconciliation possible as the means by which the needed reconciliation
can happen, because eternal life is knowing the one true God.
Comments
Post a Comment