Finally the temple guards went back to the chief priests and the Pharisees, who asked them, “Why didn’t you bring him in?”
“No one ever spoke the way this man
does,” the guards replied.
“You mean he has deceived you
also?” the Pharisees retorted. “Have any of the rulers or of the
Pharisees believed in him? No! But this mob that knows nothing of the
law—there is a curse on them.”
Nicodemus, who had gone to
Jesus earlier and who was one of their own number, asked, “Does
our law condemn a man without first hearing him to find out what he has been
doing?”
They replied, “Are you from
Galilee, too? Look into it, and you will find that a prophet does not come out
of Galilee.” (John
7:45-52)
Nevertheless, there will be no
more gloom for those who were in distress. In the past he humbled the land of
Zebulun and the land of Naphtali, but in the future he will honor Galilee of
the nations, by the Way of the Sea, beyond the Jordan— (Isaiah 9:1)
Something I encounter often is the
notion that all members of some group are the same. Before he was elected president,
Mr. Biden told a Black media personality that if he was having any problem
deciding for whom to vote, “You ain’t Black.” If you mention the names of
scientists who suggest that Evolutionary Theory is flawed, you’re likely to be told
that they aren’t real scientists. Think back to the COVID panic - and how
anyone who disagreed with Dr. Fauci was dismissed as a quack. These all go back
to a logic fallacy known as “No True Scotsman.” The idea is that a generalization
is made about some group. When an exception is mentioned, the response is that
no “true” member of that group would violate the generalization.
This is close to what’s going on in
the passage in John. They held that no Pharisee would question their
denunciation of Jesus. Period. And when Nicodemus questions their violation of Jewish
jurisprudence, they turn on him, asking a question that really has nothing to
do with the matter at hand. It may be true that no prophet came out of Galilee,
but if the Galilee mentioned in Isaiah 9:1 is the same area where Jesus grew
up, they should have been ready for God to bless Galilee in some unusual way.
Instead, they defined a Pharisee as someone who agreed with them. But the reality
is that they weren’t doing their job, which was to investigate to find the
Messiah among the many who merely claimed to be.
This is not to say that just because
someone says they are something, they are. The reverse of an error can also be
an error. If you claim to be a football player, and you’ve never held a
football, you’re not a football player. If you claim to be a Republican, or a
Democrat but don’t agree with anything the party in question includes in its
platform, you probably aren’t really what you’re claiming. And this brings us
back to the problem the Pharisees were having with Jesus. They scoffed that no
prophet comes from Galilee, but Jesus never claimed to be a prophet.
Comments
Post a Comment