Lord, who may dwell in your sacred tent?
Who may live on your holy mountain?
The one whose walk is
blameless,
who does what is righteous,
who speaks the truth from their heart;
whose tongue utters no slander,
who does no wrong to a neighbor,
and casts no slur on others;
who despises a vile person
but honors those who fear the Lord;
who keeps an oath even when it hurts,
and does not change their mind;
who lends money to the poor without interest;
who does not accept a bribe against the innocent.
Whoever does these
things
will never be shaken.
(Psalm 15)
He was despised and
rejected by mankind, a man of suffering, and familiar with pain. Like one from
whom people hide their faces he was despised, and we held him in low esteem.
(Isaiah
53:3)
Dwell…
remain…live…
To dwell,
remain, or live in God’s sacred tent or holy mountain, one must have a
blameless walk, do what is righteous, speak the truth, never slander, never do
wrong to a neighbor, never cast slurs on others, despise evil people, honor
those who fear the Lord, keep one’s oaths, lend money without interest, and
never take a bribe. Always. Never. No sometimes or oopses allowed. In fact,
sometimes and oops was the reason the high priest had to sacrifice on his own
behalf before he could sacrifice on anyone else’s.
If you read
the Old Testament, you’ll probably note that even the best of the best (which weren’t
always that great) didn’t dwell in the sacred tent/temple or dwell on the holy
mountain: not Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, Joshua (though he might have spent
more time near it than anyone else), David, Solomon (who built the Temple!), or
any of the prophets.
Our
automatic response – if we want to dwell in His sacred tent or on His holy
mountain is to buckle down and work. I remember hearing that some of the “Founding
Fathers” of America tried this idea, working to build the virtues into their
lives. When they decided they had one virtue nailed down, they started on
another, but quickly found that they lost the first. Each item on this list is
impossible for us.
But Jesus proved Himself worthy and
then He goes beyond that to extend grace to those who aren’t worthy. He even
held a comparatively civil conversation with Satan while Satan was tempting Him
in the wilderness. As I write these words, I find myself wondering whether they’re
really true. There were times when Jesus seems to come close (at least) to
slurring the Pharisees, Sadducees, the emperor, and Peter. I suspect my
definition of “slur” is off.
Another thought that comes to mind comes
from the verse from Isaiah 53 above. Normally, I think we associate not
esteeming Jesus with His appearance as He hung on the cross. But I can’t recall
ever hearing of a study that examined Jesus in terms of the seven lively
virtues: prudence, justice, temperance, and fortitude with
the three theological virtues of faith, hope, and charity.
There probably are studies, but I suspect there’s not as popular as a study of
Jesus’s commission of the seven deadly sins would be, if such a thing existed.
A study of Jesus’ virtues would be boring to us, I think. It would be
unrelatable.
This is one of the challenge
writers face. We’re told to give our characters a weakness and to make them
relatable. Unfortunately, many writer seem to think that if one weakness is “good”
then “the more the merrier,” and we end up reading about characters who have cheated
on their spouses, are addicted, can’t keep a job, are undisciplined and out of
shape…and the list goes on. It’s not a new idea – the various pantheons of gods
are basically ancient soap operas, with lots of adulterous trysts, betrayals,
and intrigues. Would we be interested in a TV or book series in which one or
more of the characters was without a vice or weakness? Some might suggest
Superman, but Clark Kent is a lie.
I wonder if the reason we held Him
in low esteem is because He wasn’t flawed.
Comments
Post a Comment