Skip to main content

Son of God


Paul, a servant of Christ Jesus, called to be an apostle and set apart for the gospel of God—  the gospel he promised beforehand through his prophets in the Holy Scriptures regarding his Son, who as to his human nature was a descendant of David, and who through the Spirit of holiness was declared with power to be the Son of God by his resurrection from the dead: Jesus Christ our Lord. (Romans 1:1-4) 

          Some people would have us believe that neither Jesus, nor any of His followers, proclaimed Jesus to be divine prior to the Council of Nicaea (fourth century.) They will further tell you that it was inserted by some anonymous writers at that point. A few may even try to tell you that King James was the responsible fraud in 1611. It’s interesting that Origin supposedly referred to Mary as Domina, the female equivalent of “Lord” in the third century, and a variety of writers were referring to her as queen by the sixth century, yet this was never included in the New Testament, which (some will say) was either completely written or at least massively changed to suit the teachings of Constantine, or whatever others anonymously changed the text. With the power that the Roman Catholic Church had over the text for as long as they had it, one would think that it had been adjusted, it would continue to have been adjusted to suit the teachings of the time. 
         Let me note here that I am not saying that Mary is the Queen of Heaven. I’m just pointing out that if adjustments were made, adjustments would have continued to have been made. In fact, if you read a Catholic Bible and a non-Catholic Bible, you may find a few changes, but I doubt you will find the major changes that people claim. No one would have thought that manuscripts could be found that would reveal the truth of the changes. Without the printing press, the normal citizen would not have had a text with which to compare it. It would have been an easy change, and the Roman Catholic Church, with all its power, could easily have considered itself qualified to make such changes.
         Yet the text of Scripture does not elevate Mary. It does speak of Jesus as the Son of God and of Jesus as Lord. That at least suggests to me that the text of Scripture was considered inviolable, sacred before any of the supposed changes were made. To make things worse, we have pieces of manuscript of Romans dated around 200 AD.  In fact, we have pieces of Scripture and quotes from Scripture dating far enough back that if such changes were made later, we would know it. We know there are thousands of variations in the text. Most of them are spelling or transcription errors that do not alter the meaning of the text. They are the equivalent of someone spelling Romans, R-O-M-I-N-S. There simply is no substantive evidence of the sorts of changes people claim were made. 
         There is no reason to assert that Paul did not believe Jesus to be the Son of God, or that he did not believe the resurrection took place. Instead, what we have is suggestions that X might be, and since X might be, we believe X, and since we believe it, it was. Watch so-called scientific documentaries. It’s the same process over and over.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Saved?

  I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; no one will snatch them out of my hand. My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than all; no one can snatch them out of my Father’s hand. I and the Father are one.” (John 10:28-30) “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your name perform many miracles?’ Then I will tell them plainly, “I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’ ” (Matthew 7:21-23) Not at all! Let God be true, and every human being a liar. As it is written: “So that you may be proved right when you speak and prevail when you judge.” (Romans 3:4)   What conclusion do you draw when someone who was raised in a Christian family and church, perhaps even playing a significant role in a chur...
Post a Comment
Read more

A Virgin?

           Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign: The virgin will be with child and will give birth to a son, and will call him Immanuel. (Isaiah 7:14)           This is how the birth of Jesus Christ came about: His mother Mary was pledged to be married to Joseph, but before they came together, she was found to be with child through the Holy Spirit. (Matthew 1:18)           But the angel said to her, “Do not be afraid, Mary, you have found favor with God. You will be with child and give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Jesus. He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High. The Lord God will give him the throne of his father David, and he will reign over the house of Jacob forever; his kingdom will never end.”            “How will this be,” Mary asked the...
Post a Comment
Read more

Meditations of the Heart

  May these words of my mouth and this meditation of my heart be pleasing in your sight, Lord, my Rock and my Redeemer. (Psalm19:14)           As I started writing this post, I noted that the meditations of my heart are all over the mental landscape, from a hub where eight superhighways come together to a lunar or nuclear landscape. Do you see my error? The moment I read the word meditation , I think about thoughts. But what’s described here is the meditations of our hearts ; our wills.           While the meditations of our minds may be all over the place, the meditations of our wills tend to be a little more stable by the time we are adults. We no longer tend to want to pursue the ten separate careers we did in any given day as children. Part of this is humble acceptance of reality. We come to understand that we can’t do it all. I think another part of it is disappointmen...
Post a Comment
Read more