These
are the things you are to teach and insist on. If anyone teaches otherwise and does not agree to the
sound instruction of our Lord Jesus Christ and to godly teaching, they are
conceited and understand nothing. They have an unhealthy interest in
controversies and quarrels about words that result in envy, strife,
malicious talk, evil suspicions and constant friction between people of corrupt mind, who
have been robbed of the truth and who think that godliness is a means to
financial gain. (I
Timothy 6:2-5)
Uh oh. “Unhealthy interest in controversies
and quarrels about words…” But, I have to say in my defense that I try to make
sure that my teaching agrees to the sound instruction of our Lord Jesus Christ
and to godly teaching. Post Modernism, on the other hand, maintains that words
have only the meaning that the hearer attaches to them – which is a slap in the
face to every writer even though it’s true in a sense. Most readers aren’t interested
or disciplined enough to research the meaning of a word in the mind of the
author or of the society in which the author lived.
For example, how many people
would examine the culture of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries
to understand that when Jefferson wrote of the “pursuit of happiness,” he was
referring to the pursuit and attainment of virtue not the mere feeling we call “happiness” or the American Dream of a
cottage with a white picket fence? I can’t
blame them – as much as I love words, I’m often no better.
No, the more I look at this
morning’s passage, the more I find myself thinking that Post Modernism and
socialism are precisely what Paul was describing. Socialism is built on class
and group conflict, with those who don’t have rising up (strife) in envy to
demand their “fair share.” If you listen to those who adhere to these
philosophies, while you hear talk of tolerance, it is tolerance only for those
who agree with them. Anyone who disagrees with them can expect to be treated
maliciously and suspiciously. Within socialism, there is constant friction. Add
Liberal Theology (which, as I understand it, is socialistic in nature) and you
have the “godliness” as a “means to financial gain.”
It could be that I’m deceiving myself,
so here’s my challenge to you. You’re welcome to disagree with me, and I
challenge you to do so – but if you’re going to disagree with me, make sure
that the teaching you insist on is based on the sound instruction of our Lord
Jesus Christ – not pulled out of context in the same way you’ll probably claim
mine is.
Comments
Post a Comment