Skip to main content

Eye For An Eye


          If a man takes the life of any human being, he shall surely be put to death. The one who takes the life of an animal shall make it good, life for life. If a man injures his neighbor, just as he has done, so it shall be done to him: fracture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for tooth; just as he has injured a man, so it shall be inflicted on him. (Leviticus 24:17-20)

          The Trojan war was fought, we are told, because a king from one city ran off with the wife of the king of another city. The result of his lust, her adultery, and the first husband’s bruised ego were the deaths of possibly as many as 70,000 people. This wasn’t and isn’t unusual. In ancient times, a slap on the face might lead to the slaughter of a family or a city.
          So how do you measure individual pain? If we both experience the same injury – say, a sprained ankle. Does that mean we both feel exactly the same amount of pain? How could we possibly tell? If you have a high tolerance for pain (or are taking a pain med that I’m not) you might say your pain is at a 3 on the scale of one-to-ten. Since I’m a wimp, I might say it’s 7 (leaving room for kidney stones, childbirth, and maybe a lost love to be considered worse – after all, emotional injuries can hurt just as much as physical.) Given the number of times I’ve sprained ankles, it’s not likely, but how can we objectively measure how much pain someone is experiencing?
          Harder still, how do we put a value on that pain? Millions of people suffered as slaves. How can we possibly begin to put a financial or another statistical figure on that? Then there are the accusations of further abuses after slavery was abolished, including claims of “systemic racism” today. How does one measure the pain of being pulled over for “driving while Black”? Is that pain less if the driver is alone in the car? Or greater? 
          Scripture limits us to an eye for an eye, and a life for a life. We aren’t permitted to follow the practice of killing the family of the man who embarrassed us. There is a place in the Bible where it describes the penalty for a crime as being equal to the price of the labor if someone had been hired to do it. Who gets the recompense? Is it divided among the descendants of the slaves, or does each descendant of each slave get the full compensation? Do we calculate it in terms of the money of the time period in which each slaved lived, or in today’s dollars? Is it in terms of the number of years slavery was practiced? Is the money only collected from descendants of those who owned slaves? And what happens when the debt is technically paid? Will those who have been receiving recompense then put out their hand and befriend the person he’s been punishing for the last 5, 50, or 500 years? And will those who have been being punished for something they never did, say that there is no debt owed to them?
     This is probably part of the reason that God put restrictions. There is no way to truly evaluate what punishment is enough for pain that’s been inflicted.  It can never be enough. There is no amount of money, no amount of contrition that will ever make up for what was done to the slaves. There is no price that will make up for the unfairness that humans show to one another. More often than not, those who have been hurt aren’t really interested in fairness or justice. They want revenge. And those from whom revenge is extracted don’t tend to shrug their shoulders and say the debt was owed – they want revenge for the pain caused to them, and the cycle continues.
          Another likely reason that God restricts penalties to “an eye for an eye” is that while we fallen humans seem to have a limited capacity to love, we have an unlimited capacity to hate. If you hate to the level of “an eye for an eye,” in hating, you become just as evil, just as hateful, just as hurtful as the one(s) you hate. God didn’t give us the “eye for an eye” limit to spare the hated. He gave it to spare the hater.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The List

              Therefore, since we have been justified through faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ,   through whom we have gained access by faith into this grace in which we now stand. And we boast in the hope of the glory of God. Not only so, but we also glory in our sufferings, because we know that suffering produces perseverance;   perseverance, character; and character, hope. And hope does not put us to shame, because God’s love has been poured out into our hearts through the Holy Spirit, who has been given to us. (Romans 5:1-5)           Think about it. We have been justified. At least, we could be justified if we stopped insisting that our justification be based on our merits. We have peace with God, or could have peace if we stopped throwing temper tantrums. We have gained access into grace i...

Meditations of the Heart

  May these words of my mouth and this meditation of my heart be pleasing in your sight, Lord, my Rock and my Redeemer. (Psalm19:14)           As I started writing this post, I noted that the meditations of my heart are all over the mental landscape, from a hub where eight superhighways come together to a lunar or nuclear landscape. Do you see my error? The moment I read the word meditation , I think about thoughts. But what’s described here is the meditations of our hearts ; our wills.           While the meditations of our minds may be all over the place, the meditations of our wills tend to be a little more stable by the time we are adults. We no longer tend to want to pursue the ten separate careers we did in any given day as children. Part of this is humble acceptance of reality. We come to understand that we can’t do it all. I think another part of it is disappointmen...

The Way, The Truth, and The Life

              Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me . (John 14:6)           If “I am the gate of the sheep…I am the good shepherd” from chapter 10 is a double whammy, this verse is a triple whammy. And its first victim is the notion that any other so-called god was acceptable or the same as Jesus. He, and He alone is the way, the truth, and the life, and the only way to get to the Father. There is no other Savior, or Redeemer, according to Jesus. Now, to be fair, other religions will claim that their religion or god(s) are the only way. That is the nature of gods and of religions. If this and that are equally good and agree on what’s necessary, then this and that are the same thing, so there’s no need to from the other to one. If that’s the case, then why speak against the other or promote the one? There’s a song I’ve been listening to i...