Skip to main content

That Woman Jezebel

 “To the angel of the church in Thyatira write:

These are the words of the Son of God, whose eyes are like blazing fire and whose feet are like burnished bronze.  I know your deeds, your love and faith, your service and perseverance, and that you are now doing more than you did at first.   Nevertheless, I have this against you: You tolerate that woman Jezebel, who calls herself a prophet. By her teaching, she misleads my servants into sexual immorality and the eating of food sacrificed to idols.  I have given her time to repent of her immorality, but she is unwilling. So I will cast her on a bed of suffering, and I will make those who commit adultery with her suffer intensely unless they repent of her ways. I will strike her children dead. Then all the churches will know that I am he who searches hearts and minds, and I will repay each of you according to your deeds.

Now I say to the rest of you in Thyatira, to you who do not hold to her teaching and have not learned Satan’s so-called deep secrets, ‘I will not impose any other burden on you, except to hold on to what you have until I come.’

To the one who is victorious and does my will to the end, I will give authority over the nations—  that one ‘will rule them with an iron scepter and will dash them to pieces like pottery’—just as I have received authority from my Father. I will also give that one the morning star. Whoever has ears, let them hear what the Spirit says to the churches. (Revelation 2:18-29)

 

Today’s passage is a deviation from the “sandwich” approach of praise, criticism, praise, carrot. It’s praise, criticism, carrot. The believers in Thyatira were apparently hard workers with lots of “the tough get going” attitude. The problem is, they tolerated a someone who led people off into sexual sins. I can’t help but think of the people, congregations, and denominations who have said that we should welcome folks who regularly and publicly practice what Scripture describes as sexual sin.

Yes, we need to keep in mind that there are lots of people in churches who commit sexual sin, and others who commit other sins, but that’s not what the passage is really about. It’s not simply that there is sexual sin going on. They are being criticized because they are tolerating a woman who 1) claimed to be speaking for God, 2) promoted sexual sin, and 3) taught Gnosticism, which often had “secrets” which weren’t known to lesser adherents, but only to those who were special or advanced in some way.

Sadly, it seems that when leaders start falling away from the truth, the first area of failure is with regard to sexual sins. Consider the number of churches and denominations that are calling for the normalization of the LGBTQ+ within the church. Consider the negative response when the Pope recently banned the blessing of gay unions because “God can’t bless sin.” There is much I don’t agree with the popes about, but this is one time that I think Pope Francis has it right, and some Protestant churches have gotten it wrong.

The “when the going gets tough” clue I find in today’s passage isn’t to steer away from sexual sins, as obviously as that might be. Jesus chides them for following – or even tolerating as a leader – someone who was not holding to the standards they knew. So, when the going gets tough, one needs to make sure that the leaders you’re following are holding to solid Biblical principles. Test the prophets and the spirits, and if they differ from what the Bible teaches, don’t follow them.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The List

              Therefore, since we have been justified through faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ,   through whom we have gained access by faith into this grace in which we now stand. And we boast in the hope of the glory of God. Not only so, but we also glory in our sufferings, because we know that suffering produces perseverance;   perseverance, character; and character, hope. And hope does not put us to shame, because God’s love has been poured out into our hearts through the Holy Spirit, who has been given to us. (Romans 5:1-5)           Think about it. We have been justified. At least, we could be justified if we stopped insisting that our justification be based on our merits. We have peace with God, or could have peace if we stopped throwing temper tantrums. We have gained access into grace i...
Post a Comment
Read more

Meditations of the Heart

  May these words of my mouth and this meditation of my heart be pleasing in your sight, Lord, my Rock and my Redeemer. (Psalm19:14)           As I started writing this post, I noted that the meditations of my heart are all over the mental landscape, from a hub where eight superhighways come together to a lunar or nuclear landscape. Do you see my error? The moment I read the word meditation , I think about thoughts. But what’s described here is the meditations of our hearts ; our wills.           While the meditations of our minds may be all over the place, the meditations of our wills tend to be a little more stable by the time we are adults. We no longer tend to want to pursue the ten separate careers we did in any given day as children. Part of this is humble acceptance of reality. We come to understand that we can’t do it all. I think another part of it is disappointmen...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Way, The Truth, and The Life

              Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me . (John 14:6)           If “I am the gate of the sheep…I am the good shepherd” from chapter 10 is a double whammy, this verse is a triple whammy. And its first victim is the notion that any other so-called god was acceptable or the same as Jesus. He, and He alone is the way, the truth, and the life, and the only way to get to the Father. There is no other Savior, or Redeemer, according to Jesus. Now, to be fair, other religions will claim that their religion or god(s) are the only way. That is the nature of gods and of religions. If this and that are equally good and agree on what’s necessary, then this and that are the same thing, so there’s no need to from the other to one. If that’s the case, then why speak against the other or promote the one? There’s a song I’ve been listening to i...
Post a Comment
Read more