Skip to main content

Love Is Love?

              Anyone who loves their brother and sister lives in the light, and there is nothing in them to make them stumble. (I John 2:10)


            Love does no harm to a neighbor. Therefore love is the fulfillment of the law. (Romans 13:10) 

            Love is love.

 

            The last of the quotes above is popular today. The idea seems to be that if you love someone, it doesn’t matter who you love; it’s still love. The problem with this is that the definition of “love” is assumed. In one sense, one doesn’t love pizza, kittens, certain songs, one’s children, one’s job, one’s neighbor, and one’s spouse, all in the exact same way.

            In Os Guinness’s The Call, he discusses “two contrasting views of love that have shaped Western searching for the past three thousand years.”[1] The first is eros. This is the love that seeks to be made happy through the possession of a loved object. This is the love of the person who says, “I love ______ because _______ makes me happy, fulfilled, laugh, etc.”

            The second view of love is agape which, as Dallas Willard describes it, seeks the good of the beloved. Happiness is found in doing what is in the best interest of the beloved.

            Rarely, the two are not at least intertwined. We can act in the best interest of the bellowed because it is in the best interest of the beloved while simultaneously checking to see if anyone is noticing what a good person we are or even to prove to ourselves we are good people. I must admit that I spend a lot of time in this continuum, and I’m rather afraid of where I am between the extremes of complete eros and complete agape. I suspect the times when I am closest to agape is when I do something to help without thinking about it.

            Another aspect of this is that we’re learning – or we’re supposed to be learning – the agape end of the continuum. When you learn to do something,  you tend to think about it a lot.  You might watch yourself in a mirror, or ask someone to critique your work. This means that as we learn, we may focus more on the act of love than we do on the person we are supposed to be loving. The same is true when we teach others to love. This is to be expected and excused because learning is a process that requires attention. But the goal is to reach the point where we seek the best interest of others because that’s what we do – even if it means foregoing our own pleasure.


[1] Guinness, Os, The Call (Nashville, TN, W. Publishing Group, 1998), p. 12

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Especially to those who belong to the family of believers."

Therefore, as we have opportunity, let us do good to all people, especially to those who belong to the family of believers. (Gal 6:10)   “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another.   By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.” (John 13:34-35)           Joshua grinned when he saw Rex standing by the door, studying something on the ground. "Hey, man! Are we ready to do this thing?"          Rex looked up. "Josh, I can't do it. We're still best buds, but I can't stand your fiancée."           I've met "Rex" many times. I've been Rex. Joshua (Jesus) loves the Church. He's not a fool. He knows the Church is far from perfect, but she is His chosen bride. The Rexes of this world, who think themselves His friend, turn away from her. "You don't need the Church to...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ssssssubmmissssssionnn

Submit to one another out of reverence for Christ . (Ephesians 5:21)             "Ssssssubmmisssssssionnn." Can't you just hear the serpent hissing this most horrible of words? If you listen to the serpent or the world, submission means groveling, allowing yourself to be abused, denying yourself your own humanity. Nothing could be worse than submission, could it?             Submission has never been a problem for me, as long as things are going the way I want them to. The rest of the time? Well, let's just say that while I don't know how to fight physically, I don't know how to not fight mentally. One of the fights I've been having with myself for years is about submission.             My first breakthrough took place on a trip to a bookstore. As I walked into the store, my thoughts were very clear. 1) I was goi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Shark Fins, Triple Dog Dares, Heroes, Villains and Sidekicks

Two are better than one, because they have a good return for their work: If one falls down, his friend can help him up. But pity the man who falls and has no one to help him up! Also, if two lie down together, they will keep warm. But how can one keep warm alone? Though one may be overpowered, two can defend themselves. A cord of three strands is not quickly broken (Ecclesiastes 4:9-12)            There's a scene in Jaws in which someone sees a shark fin and starts a panic. As   all the swimmers scramble to shore, boats surround the fin, which falls over to reveal two kids. With several guns pointed at them, one of the kids points at the other. The message is clear: it was his idea. In Christmas Story, there's a scene in which one kid "triple dog dares" another to do something stupid. Since it's a triple dog dare, well, what choice does the boy have? There doesn't seem to be any end to the trouble that peer pressure can cause. ...
Post a Comment
Read more