Skip to main content

What? Who?

          Love must be sincere. Hate what is evil; cling to what is good.  (Romans 12:9)

          Sincere: 1530s, "pure, unmixed, unadulterated;" also "free from pretense or falsehood," from French sincere (16c.), from Latin sincerus, of things, "whole, clean, pure, uninjured, unmixed," figuratively "sound, genuine, pure, true, candid, truthful" (unadulterated by deceit), a word of uncertain origin. Apparently the popular etymology of “without wax” has no historical basis. (Etymology of "sincere" by etymonline)

          Love must be pure, unmixed, unadulterated, free from pretense or falsehood, whole, clean, pure, uninjured, and unmixed. That’s an intimidating list of requirements, but it comes down to a simple idea. Love must be love. But the fact that someone feels the need to mention it (with good reason!) suggests that, contrary to the popular belief of some, “love” is not necessarily love. At the very least, it might be impure, mixed, adulterated, full of pretense or falsehood, divided, dirty, impure, injured, or mixed.

Now, here’s the question that seems to be begged. What is the object of the love that is sincere? Can someone love without an object. I know one can love nothing, but can one love nothing? Even if someone claims to love nothing, can they be telling the truth and undeluded? A better philosopher could probably answer that with authority and logic. I can only answer it from intuition, and I suspect one cannot love nothing. At the very least, it would require that the lover of nothing destroy everything because otherwise, everything contaminates the nothing.

Having come that far, the next word is curious. Read it as if you have never read it before. “Hate…” What is the word you expect? Is it “What”? Or “Who”? Given the rest of Scripture, and the commands to love God, love our neighbors, and love our enemies, I think I expected a call to hate someone, not something. On the other hand, hating something makes it safe. We can claim our hatred is directed at something and take it out on those people who do it, approve of it, condone it, or otherwise fail to hate it in the manner we think they should. But we’re told to love our enemies, so that fails the test.

Going back a few days, there’s a description for what we are to do in our hatred of something: fight or flight. But when we choose to fight, our choice of weapons and enemies is often wrong. We aim at who, not what, and we’re too often too wiling to use the government – the power of the sword.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Especially to those who belong to the family of believers."

Therefore, as we have opportunity, let us do good to all people, especially to those who belong to the family of believers. (Gal 6:10)   “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another.   By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.” (John 13:34-35)           Joshua grinned when he saw Rex standing by the door, studying something on the ground. "Hey, man! Are we ready to do this thing?"          Rex looked up. "Josh, I can't do it. We're still best buds, but I can't stand your fiancée."           I've met "Rex" many times. I've been Rex. Joshua (Jesus) loves the Church. He's not a fool. He knows the Church is far from perfect, but she is His chosen bride. The Rexes of this world, who think themselves His friend, turn away from her. "You don't need the Church to...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ssssssubmmissssssionnn

Submit to one another out of reverence for Christ . (Ephesians 5:21)             "Ssssssubmmisssssssionnn." Can't you just hear the serpent hissing this most horrible of words? If you listen to the serpent or the world, submission means groveling, allowing yourself to be abused, denying yourself your own humanity. Nothing could be worse than submission, could it?             Submission has never been a problem for me, as long as things are going the way I want them to. The rest of the time? Well, let's just say that while I don't know how to fight physically, I don't know how to not fight mentally. One of the fights I've been having with myself for years is about submission.             My first breakthrough took place on a trip to a bookstore. As I walked into the store, my thoughts were very clear. 1) I was goi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Shark Fins, Triple Dog Dares, Heroes, Villains and Sidekicks

Two are better than one, because they have a good return for their work: If one falls down, his friend can help him up. But pity the man who falls and has no one to help him up! Also, if two lie down together, they will keep warm. But how can one keep warm alone? Though one may be overpowered, two can defend themselves. A cord of three strands is not quickly broken (Ecclesiastes 4:9-12)            There's a scene in Jaws in which someone sees a shark fin and starts a panic. As   all the swimmers scramble to shore, boats surround the fin, which falls over to reveal two kids. With several guns pointed at them, one of the kids points at the other. The message is clear: it was his idea. In Christmas Story, there's a scene in which one kid "triple dog dares" another to do something stupid. Since it's a triple dog dare, well, what choice does the boy have? There doesn't seem to be any end to the trouble that peer pressure can cause. ...
Post a Comment
Read more