Skip to main content

Jabez

             Jabez was more honorable than his brothers. His mother had named him Jabez,  saying, “I gave birth to him in pain.” Jabez cried out to the God of Israel, “Oh, that you would bless me and enlarge my territory! Let your hand be with me, and keep me from harm so that I will be free from pain.” And God granted his request. (I Chronicles 4:9-10)

 

            It's been a long time since I thought about this prayer. Someone wrote a book about it, and it was quite popular in Christian circles for a time. One idea taught about it was that Jabez, having caused his mother pain when he was born, was not so much praying that he would not suffer pain but that God would keep him from causing pain to others, which in turn would free him from the pain of having caused it.

            This could be true, or he may have seen the effect pain had on his mother, who named him because “Jabez” sounds like the word for “pain.” I can’t imagine the pain of going through life being called what others would probably think of as “Pain in the _____.” In the culture of that time, one’s name was often said to describe one’s character. In a way, Jabez may have been seeking a new name or the chance to overcome his reputation (which had more to do with his mother’s character than his.)

            What the passage says, though, is that he wanted God to keep him from harm and pain. He wanted God’s blessing and more territory, and God gave it to him. We don’t know how much God gave him or what he did with it other than the fact that he was nobler than his siblings.

            That leads us to another interesting tidbit about Jabez. I Chronicles 2 says that the Kenites lived at Jabez. The only other mention of the name is found in today’s passage. He is not mentioned in the preceding verses that list the sons of Helah. His mother called him “Jabez” while his father called him Zereth, Zohar, Ethnan, or Koz. It seems odd that Jabez’ story, which is complete in these two verses, should be completely disconnected from its context.

            With all of that as background and foundation, what are we to make of these verses? Starting with what connects us with Jabez, he asked for a blessing and an enlarged territory, and God granted the request. He wanted more. We don’t know why, but he wanted more. We tend to be like him. How rich is rich enough? A little more. How happy is happy enough? A little more, especially if something isn’t quite right. And God granted it. We aren’t told that Jabez had a two-hour-long discourse on how he intended to use the blessing and extended territory. There only justification he provides is that he wants to be free of pain.

            But, the next thing Scripture tells us is that he was nobler than his brothers. It doesn’t tell us how he was noble, and if his brothers were zeros on a scale of one to ten, he might have been a one. I suspect there was a bigger difference than that, but that is all that’s necessary. He might have been more deserving of the blessing and expansion he asked for than his brothers, but that doesn’t mean he deserved it.

            We’re not told how much blessing or expansion he got. We’re not told how he used it. All we’re told is that he asked, and he got it. God isn’t obligated to give – and Scripture makes it clear that blessings often involve getting God, not things. But how many of us don’t ask, or don’t keep asking, or have a specific, selfish way that we demand that He bless us? How often do we not have because we do not ask? How often do we get the blessing and expansion without showing the nobility to be grateful?

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The List

              Therefore, since we have been justified through faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ,   through whom we have gained access by faith into this grace in which we now stand. And we boast in the hope of the glory of God. Not only so, but we also glory in our sufferings, because we know that suffering produces perseverance;   perseverance, character; and character, hope. And hope does not put us to shame, because God’s love has been poured out into our hearts through the Holy Spirit, who has been given to us. (Romans 5:1-5)           Think about it. We have been justified. At least, we could be justified if we stopped insisting that our justification be based on our merits. We have peace with God, or could have peace if we stopped throwing temper tantrums. We have gained access into grace i...

Listen To Him

              The Lord your God will raise up for you a prophet like me from among you, from your fellow Israelites. You must listen to him . (Deuteronomy 18:15)           Today, we switch from Jesus’ claims of “I am” to prophecies made about Him. My Bible platform is starting in Deuteronomy. I’d start in Genesis, where we would learn that the one who would save us would be a descendant of Eve (Genesis 3:15), of Noah (by default), Abram and Sara(Genesis 12:1-3). Isaac (Genesis 17:19), Jacob (Genesis 25:23), Judah (Genesis 29:8), and David (II Samuel 7:12-16). There were also references to a new covenant (Jer. 31:31-34; Ezek. 36:22-32). In addition, there were prophecies about when and where the prophet/Messiah would be born and what would happen to him.           Of course, naysayers will claim that Jesus’ life was retrofitted or reverse enginee...

The Way, The Truth, and The Life

              Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me . (John 14:6)           If “I am the gate of the sheep…I am the good shepherd” from chapter 10 is a double whammy, this verse is a triple whammy. And its first victim is the notion that any other so-called god was acceptable or the same as Jesus. He, and He alone is the way, the truth, and the life, and the only way to get to the Father. There is no other Savior, or Redeemer, according to Jesus. Now, to be fair, other religions will claim that their religion or god(s) are the only way. That is the nature of gods and of religions. If this and that are equally good and agree on what’s necessary, then this and that are the same thing, so there’s no need to from the other to one. If that’s the case, then why speak against the other or promote the one? There’s a song I’ve been listening to i...