Her husband is respected at the city gate, where he takes his seat among the elders of the land. (Proverbs 31:23)
Oh, I can
hear the feminists groaning already. Part of what makes her a Proverbs 31 woman is
the social status of her husband? I admit, as a single, I feel a little
uncomfortable with this. But what’s really being said here? This verse is in the
middle of the verses shared yesterday. It’s in between the clothing in scarlet and
purple and in strength and dignity. In a sense, then, one might say her husband
is, by his connection with her, clothed in scarlet, purple, strength, and
dignity. And she is, by her connection with him, respected in the city gate and
among the elders/rulers of the land.
Those who go to
the city gate (effectively the courthouse of the day) didn’t have to worry
about this husband’s wife or children being involved in the incidents over
which the elders judged, or that he would be corrupt or for sale, because his
wife wouldn’t stand for it and made it “unnecessary.”
This all
leads me, as a single, to wonder about my “husbands.” Am I the sort of person whose
connection with someone or something brings respect to the person or thing? Is
the church I attend seen as a positive thing because, after all, I go there and
I wouldn’t go somewhere that wasn’t respectable? Is the place I work more
respectable because I work there than it would be if I didn’t? Are any of the
organizations I have been part of (including family) likely to say with pride
or affection, “Karen is (or was once) one of us”?
And, of
course, these questions sets off my “I want to be invisible” response. While I
would be mortified to find that a person, place, or thing was disrespected because
of me (and I won’t say it’s not the case,) I would be terrified to discover
that my “marriage” to the person, place, or thing was a reason (let
alone the reason) for someone’s good opinion of it. This brings me back
to “cross necklaces” and/or “bumper stickers.”
But, to be a Proverbs 31 woman…
Comments
Post a Comment