Skip to main content

Wait

            But Jesus went to the Mount of Olives.  At dawn he appeared again in the temple courts, where all the people gathered around him, and he sat down to teach them.  The teachers of the law and the Pharisees brought in a woman caught in adultery. They made her stand before the group  and said to Jesus, “Teacher, this woman was caught in the act of adultery.  In the Law Moses commanded us to stone such women. Now what do you say?” They were using this question as a trap, in order to have a basis for accusing him.
         But Jesus bent down and started to write on the ground with his finger.  When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, “Let any one of you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her.” Again he stooped down and wrote on the ground.
               At this, those who heard began to go away one at a time, the older ones first, until only Jesus was left, with the woman still standing there.  Jesus straightened up and asked her, “Woman, where are they? Has no one condemned you?”
               “No one, sir,” she said.
         “Then neither do I condemn you,” Jesus declared. “Go now and leave your life of sin.” (John 8:1-11)

          If a man commits adultery with another man’s wife—with the wife of his neighbor—both the adulterer and the adulteress are to be put to death. (Leviticus 20:10)

          As a quick aside, I’ve heard that the Mount of Olives was a hangout for Jesus, but this is the first time I noticed Him going there before the night He was betrayed.
          Now, on to the main event. John says the religious leaders brought the woman caught in adultery to Jesus in order to have a basis for accusing him. I have questions. What was the act of adultery (Was she pulled from her lover’s bed, or just his arms?) How did they know or find her? For how long did they let the relationship continue before they “caught” her? Why were they breaking the law by not bringing both the adulterer and adulteress? What did Jesus write in the dirt? Why did the older leave before the younger? Answers to all of these would be speculation. As fun as speculation can be, there’s something else here that needs to be discussed more.
         This passage is used to judge and condemn Christians for “judging” or “condemning” others. The Pharisees and religious leadership delighted in condemning the woman (they say). Jesus let her go (they say.) That’s not quite what the text says. Jesus does not condemn her, but neither does he condone what she had done. He doesn’t tell her that her adultery is fine with him, acceptable behavior, or not his to judge. He doesn’t dismiss the case. He releases her with a warning. “Go and leave your life of sin.”
         In our society today, we are told that we are not only not permitted to judge, but that we must open our arms to both the sinner and the sin. Accusing or shaming someone is wrong, unless that person is intolerant, or a bigot, or a racist, or they don’t approve of homosexual “marriage” or use the wrong pronoun, or don’t want to reward people for entering this country illegally, or they don’t think the government should be the source of every solution to every problem the nation faces…. And figuratively dragging women (and men, and whatever) “caught in adultery” into the conversation is the method used for trapping those monstrous Pharisees.
         Oh, wait, it was the Pharisees who did the dragging. It was the Pharisees who were trying to trap, to find reason to accuse. And wait, Jesus told her to leave her life of sin. He didn't tell her what she was doing was fine.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The List

              Therefore, since we have been justified through faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ,   through whom we have gained access by faith into this grace in which we now stand. And we boast in the hope of the glory of God. Not only so, but we also glory in our sufferings, because we know that suffering produces perseverance;   perseverance, character; and character, hope. And hope does not put us to shame, because God’s love has been poured out into our hearts through the Holy Spirit, who has been given to us. (Romans 5:1-5)           Think about it. We have been justified. At least, we could be justified if we stopped insisting that our justification be based on our merits. We have peace with God, or could have peace if we stopped throwing temper tantrums. We have gained access into grace i...

Listen!

  While he was still speaking, a bright cloud enveloped them, and a voice from the cloud said, “This is my Son, whom I love; with him I am well pleased. Listen to him!” (Matthew 17:5)            Do you like roller coasters? I don't. You spend forever climbing a hill. You get to the top and have half a second, then you race down to a low point. Sometimes the racing down involves tying your insides into knots. At the bottom, you either have to be dragged up another hill or you get off the ride. Peter's life was a roller coaster from the time he met Jesus. There would be miracles, and then Jesus would teach things that didn't always make sense, and then they'd go out and perform miracles, and return to be taught. Peter was praised for giving the right answer to "Who do you say that I am?" Jesus said that said answer came from God. Peter was at the top of the hill.            ...

The Way, The Truth, and The Life

              Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me . (John 14:6)           If “I am the gate of the sheep…I am the good shepherd” from chapter 10 is a double whammy, this verse is a triple whammy. And its first victim is the notion that any other so-called god was acceptable or the same as Jesus. He, and He alone is the way, the truth, and the life, and the only way to get to the Father. There is no other Savior, or Redeemer, according to Jesus. Now, to be fair, other religions will claim that their religion or god(s) are the only way. That is the nature of gods and of religions. If this and that are equally good and agree on what’s necessary, then this and that are the same thing, so there’s no need to from the other to one. If that’s the case, then why speak against the other or promote the one? There’s a song I’ve been listening to i...