Skip to main content

Contradiction!

        The next day John was there again with two of his disciples. When he saw Jesus passing by, he said, “Look, the Lamb of God!"
          When the two disciples heard him say this, they followed Jesus. Turning around, Jesus saw them following and asked, “What do you want?”
          They said, “Rabbi” (which means “Teacher”), “where are you staying?”       “Come,” he replied, “and you will see.”
          So they went and saw where he was staying, and they spent that day with him. It was about four in the afternoon. Andrew, Simon Peter’s brother, was one of the two who heard what John had said and who had followed Jesus. The first thing Andrew did was to find his brother Simon and tell him, “We have found the Messiah” (that is, the Christ). And he brought him to Jesus.
         Jesus looked at him and said, “You are Simon son of John. You will be called Cephas” (which, when translated, is Peter.) (John 1:35-42)

          Wait a minute! Where’s the sea shore? Where are the fishing nets? Where is Jesus saying, “Come, follow me, and I will make you fishers of men”? Where is the out of the blue calling of disciples Jesus had never met? “Excuse me, folks, we have a contradiction!”
          Well, no, it’s just an apparent contradiction. This is one of those passages that shows how important it is to study the whole of Scripture, and not just parts. The synoptic gospels leave this part out. Why? Matthew wasn’t there. Neither was Peter (who purportedly provided the material for Mark.) While Luke says that he did exhaustive research (and it’s apparent in his account), this scene doesn’t hold the same historical gravitas as the scene in which Jesus calls them to be disciples. It would be important to John if John were one who had been with Andrew.
          The fact that the writer doesn’t name him as John has two possible explanations. The first is that it was considered rude to name oneself in such a way. The second is that the person described was still alive at the time of the writing, and therefore might be placed in danger if he were named. John fits both those descriptions.
           At the end of the book of John, the author notes that no account of Jesus’ life includes all that happened. The writers had to pick, and while some events are obvious, others would depend on the reason the author was writing it and the audience for whom it was written. The book of John was written for a Jewish audience. For them, this scene would have been important because it would establish that the author, as a witness, was there from the start and it would show continuity from the Old Testament, through John, the last prophet, to Jesus. 
As for the apparent contradiction, the author doesn’t say that the scene on the beach didn’t take place. As we read his account, we’ll get there. It just wasn’t as out of the blue as some people like to teach.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Saved?

  I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; no one will snatch them out of my hand. My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than all; no one can snatch them out of my Father’s hand. I and the Father are one.” (John 10:28-30) “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your name perform many miracles?’ Then I will tell them plainly, “I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’ ” (Matthew 7:21-23) Not at all! Let God be true, and every human being a liar. As it is written: “So that you may be proved right when you speak and prevail when you judge.” (Romans 3:4)   What conclusion do you draw when someone who was raised in a Christian family and church, perhaps even playing a significant role in a chur...

Meditations of the Heart

  May these words of my mouth and this meditation of my heart be pleasing in your sight, Lord, my Rock and my Redeemer. (Psalm19:14)           As I started writing this post, I noted that the meditations of my heart are all over the mental landscape, from a hub where eight superhighways come together to a lunar or nuclear landscape. Do you see my error? The moment I read the word meditation , I think about thoughts. But what’s described here is the meditations of our hearts ; our wills.           While the meditations of our minds may be all over the place, the meditations of our wills tend to be a little more stable by the time we are adults. We no longer tend to want to pursue the ten separate careers we did in any given day as children. Part of this is humble acceptance of reality. We come to understand that we can’t do it all. I think another part of it is disappointmen...

The Shepherd!

                 “I am the good shepherd; I know my sheep and my sheep know me— just as the Father knows me and I know the Father—and I lay down my life for the sheep . (John 10:14) God said to Moses, “I am who I am. This is what you are to say to the Israelites: ‘I am has sent me to you.’” (Genesis 3:14) The Lord is my shepherd, I lack nothing. He makes me lie down in green pastures, he leads me beside quiet waters, he refreshes my soul. He guides me along the right paths     for his name’s sake. Even though I walk     through the darkest valley, I will fear no evil,     for you are with me; your rod and your staff,     they comfort me. (Psalm 23:1-4) For the Jews, it was politically incorrect to make claims about yourself as a teacher (or possibly as anything else.) Teachers were expected to take pride in the...