Skip to main content

Fools

 

The fool says in his heart, “There is no God.” They are corrupt, their deeds are vile; there is no one who does good. (Psalm 14:1)

 

 since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse. (Romans 1:19-20)

 

I’m reading Knowing Christ Today by Dallas Willard, but even if I weren’t, the first line of this psalm wakes the debater in me. In my mind, I hear someone charging that calling someone a fool is wrong (unless they are doing it) and that the Bible should show more tolerance for the diversity of beliefs out there. However, the Bible is absolutely accurate in its claim. Unless the person making the claim was somehow omniscient, to make the claim “There is no God” is unsupportable. They simply can’t know it. So, making the claim shows them to be fools.

The statement about their corruption and vileness touches on their motives. Why would someone say, “There is no God”? A number of reasons come to mind. They want to win a debate. They want to lower the person with whom they are debating to their moral level. I knew one person who not only tried to argue that if I got some “good sex” that I’d stop believing in God, but also that if I stopped believing in God I would slip into the use of foul language and alcohol and other drugs, which he apparently thought a good thing. In short, he thought that if I stopped believing in God, he would become my moral model. A third reason is that they want to be God, as demonstrated by their desire to be the one who chooses what morality (if any) to follow.

The one thing the statement “There is no God” never attempts to assert is that there simply and factually is no God. There is always a reason – even if they won’t admit it – that they want there to be no God. It should be noted that in the time that this psalm was written, the generally issue wasn’t the existence of a God. It was with the multiplicity of gods from which they could choose: Baal, Chemosh, Molech, and later Jupiter, Zeus, Odin, and their more broad-spectrum but specialized kin (gods of different small specialties, rather like the doctors of today.)

          One of the great arguments that there is a God is the fact that others insist that there is not, and that it is best and right for us – instead – to conform ourselves to their way of thinking.  If there is no God, why do they want to take His place? Why do they take such great offense at the claim that there is? Why is the claim that God exists any more enraging than the claim that black holes exist?

          Some would say that black holes have been scientifically proven, and therefore there’s no sense in debating it, but I don’t think that’s the issue. Instead, the  problem is that if God exists, He has the right or ability to impose His will on others. Black holes aren’t near enough to be a threat, but God can be anywhere and everywhere. In other words, one doesn’t really have much need to be able to respond to a black hole, but God can demand that we take responsibility. That is the crime for which He must be executed as many times as it takes. Unfortunately for them, they can’t execute Him effectively enough no matter how many times they try. He’s shown that death can’t keep Him in the ground. So, instead, they pretend and demand that others bow to their pretense.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The List

              Therefore, since we have been justified through faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ,   through whom we have gained access by faith into this grace in which we now stand. And we boast in the hope of the glory of God. Not only so, but we also glory in our sufferings, because we know that suffering produces perseverance;   perseverance, character; and character, hope. And hope does not put us to shame, because God’s love has been poured out into our hearts through the Holy Spirit, who has been given to us. (Romans 5:1-5)           Think about it. We have been justified. At least, we could be justified if we stopped insisting that our justification be based on our merits. We have peace with God, or could have peace if we stopped throwing temper tantrums. We have gained access into grace i...
Post a Comment
Read more

Meditations of the Heart

  May these words of my mouth and this meditation of my heart be pleasing in your sight, Lord, my Rock and my Redeemer. (Psalm19:14)           As I started writing this post, I noted that the meditations of my heart are all over the mental landscape, from a hub where eight superhighways come together to a lunar or nuclear landscape. Do you see my error? The moment I read the word meditation , I think about thoughts. But what’s described here is the meditations of our hearts ; our wills.           While the meditations of our minds may be all over the place, the meditations of our wills tend to be a little more stable by the time we are adults. We no longer tend to want to pursue the ten separate careers we did in any given day as children. Part of this is humble acceptance of reality. We come to understand that we can’t do it all. I think another part of it is disappointmen...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Way, The Truth, and The Life

              Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me . (John 14:6)           If “I am the gate of the sheep…I am the good shepherd” from chapter 10 is a double whammy, this verse is a triple whammy. And its first victim is the notion that any other so-called god was acceptable or the same as Jesus. He, and He alone is the way, the truth, and the life, and the only way to get to the Father. There is no other Savior, or Redeemer, according to Jesus. Now, to be fair, other religions will claim that their religion or god(s) are the only way. That is the nature of gods and of religions. If this and that are equally good and agree on what’s necessary, then this and that are the same thing, so there’s no need to from the other to one. If that’s the case, then why speak against the other or promote the one? There’s a song I’ve been listening to i...
Post a Comment
Read more