God blessed them and said to them, “Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky and over every living creature that moves on the ground.” (Genesis 1:28)
Our very being still assign us to “rule” in our life circumstances,
whatever they may be. If animals are in trouble anywhere, for example, people
generally feel they should do something about it -- or at least that someone
should. And we still experience ourselves as creative will, as someone who
accomplishes things, constantly desiring to generate value, or what is good,
from ourselves and from our environment. We are perhaps all too ready, given our distorted
vision and will, to take charge of the earth. (Dallas Willard The Divine
Conspiracy, p 30)
One of the things that The Divine Conspiracy has been
showing me is that I’m normal. I’m the way people are designed to be. Oh, I’m a
distortion in the details, but when I complain to God (and everyone else) that
I feel out of control, and that I can’t get a grip, that’s not because I’m
evil. It’s a recognition that I am supposed to be ruling, not spinning out of
control. When I feel the need to accomplish, to do, to make, to create, it’s a
recognition that I’m supposed to be doing those things. That doesn’t mean I go
about them correctly. It doesn’t mean that my ego doesn’t get in the way. It doesn’t
mean that I’m trying to usurp God’s throne – I might be, but I might also just
be responding to the echoes of what I was created to be.
Which is little more than a variation on the cute wisdom of “Don’t
should on yourself.” It’s “Don’t shouldn’t on yourself.” There are times when
we should should, or should shouldn’t – but I’ve tended (or been encouraged) to
believe that if I try to get control, to fix, to rule, to do – or feel the need
to do any of those things, that somehow, it’s automatically something for which
I should be punished. How dare I extend my rule even over myself? But what
Prof. Willard suggests is that Genesis 1:28 tells us that we are supposed to
rule over the animals. He goes further to suggest that we are intended to be
creative.
Granted, I think sometimes I get more wound up about the need to
do these things than I do about the actual doing of them. That’s where the shoulding
and shouldn’ting comes in. I seem to think I need to gain approval each step of
the way. The ego isn’t as dead as I’d like it to be.
Now, as to the distorted side of all of this. I watched a video
series some time ago about dealing with poverty. One of the big ideas the
series presented was that we tend to rush into “helping.” A church heard about
poor people in East Africa, and shipped tons of clothing to help them – and destroyed
the textile industry in East Africa. Another group heard about hunger in south
Asia, and sent lots and lots of eggs, which put farmers out of business. I’ve
been guilty, too – I arranged to send clothing to victims of Hurricane Katrina –
when clothing wasn’t really what was needed. We want to HELP. Do something! Anything!
Sometimes, our helping meets our need to help more than it needs
their need to be helped. This is a report I’m hearing about people raising
Monarchs. They’re trying to help, but what some may be doing is spreading a
disease that is helping to destroy the Monarch population. Good rulership isn’t
about helping. It’s about acting in the best interest of the ruled. Good helping
requires wisdom.
Lots more thinking, and some changes of habits are needed here.
Comments
Post a Comment