Skip to main content

Love Languages...

              “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.” (John 13:34-35)

 

          Now, let’s start with the Greek. The word for love is transliterated agape. It’s not philos, which is brotherly love or friendship. In other words, we’re not called to like one another. We’re called to love one another – to look out for what is in the best interest of, and to be committed to maintain a relationship with the other person. This command given by Jesus doesn’t involve our loving those who aren’t Christians. That’s elsewhere. This is tough because Christians are humans and humans can be world-class jerks. This is what some folks don’t seem to get – it’s not the Christians, the Atheists, the Whites, the Blacks, the educated, the uneducated, the right, or the poor that are jerks. It’s people.

          But one of the two major functions of any religion is really to teach people how to deal with one another. One of the goals of religion is to teach people not to be jerks. It’s the same with philosophy. In the wrong hands, the purpose tends to shift to justifying the jerk-hood of those who follow the religion or philosophy.

          As one world-class jerk to another, I find that my jerkiness tends to be activated when I have to interact with people. I would much rather do something for someone – especially something I enjoy doing – than to spend time with the person. This is especially true if it involves listening to the person. I claim my “love language” is acts of service. If there are love languages, are there not also hate languages?

          If I may paraphrase Dallas Willard, attack and withdrawal are hate languages, but I suspect that there are dialects and that they are distortions of our love languages: acts of service, words of affirmation, touch, gifts, and quality time. So, my hatred might be expressed through my not helping someone, by doing something designed to harm or humiliate the person, or by doing for something they can and should do for themselves.

          This is just a theory on my part, but it makes sense. Do you know what your love language(s) is(are)? What would using those words, that time, that touch, those acts of service, or those gifts to harm look like? What would withdrawing them be like? 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Especially to those who belong to the family of believers."

Therefore, as we have opportunity, let us do good to all people, especially to those who belong to the family of believers. (Gal 6:10)   “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another.   By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.” (John 13:34-35)           Joshua grinned when he saw Rex standing by the door, studying something on the ground. "Hey, man! Are we ready to do this thing?"          Rex looked up. "Josh, I can't do it. We're still best buds, but I can't stand your fiancée."           I've met "Rex" many times. I've been Rex. Joshua (Jesus) loves the Church. He's not a fool. He knows the Church is far from perfect, but she is His chosen bride. The Rexes of this world, who think themselves His friend, turn away from her. "You don't need the Church to...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ssssssubmmissssssionnn

Submit to one another out of reverence for Christ . (Ephesians 5:21)             "Ssssssubmmisssssssionnn." Can't you just hear the serpent hissing this most horrible of words? If you listen to the serpent or the world, submission means groveling, allowing yourself to be abused, denying yourself your own humanity. Nothing could be worse than submission, could it?             Submission has never been a problem for me, as long as things are going the way I want them to. The rest of the time? Well, let's just say that while I don't know how to fight physically, I don't know how to not fight mentally. One of the fights I've been having with myself for years is about submission.             My first breakthrough took place on a trip to a bookstore. As I walked into the store, my thoughts were very clear. 1) I was goi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Shark Fins, Triple Dog Dares, Heroes, Villains and Sidekicks

Two are better than one, because they have a good return for their work: If one falls down, his friend can help him up. But pity the man who falls and has no one to help him up! Also, if two lie down together, they will keep warm. But how can one keep warm alone? Though one may be overpowered, two can defend themselves. A cord of three strands is not quickly broken (Ecclesiastes 4:9-12)            There's a scene in Jaws in which someone sees a shark fin and starts a panic. As   all the swimmers scramble to shore, boats surround the fin, which falls over to reveal two kids. With several guns pointed at them, one of the kids points at the other. The message is clear: it was his idea. In Christmas Story, there's a scene in which one kid "triple dog dares" another to do something stupid. Since it's a triple dog dare, well, what choice does the boy have? There doesn't seem to be any end to the trouble that peer pressure can cause. ...
Post a Comment
Read more