It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. (I Corinthians 13:5)
Feel
free to repeat yesterday’s exercises with this verse. Today’s selection from
this famous passage demonstrates something worthy of consideration. It (love)
does not…is not…is not…keeps no. Yesterday’s selection included two positives
(patient, kind) but three negatives (not envy, not boast, not proud.) In this
famous passage, we are told seven things that love is or does, and nine things
that love is not and does not.
The
first point for today: Love does not dishonor others. The Greek Interlinear
translation I have says, “does not act unbecomingly.” There’s some cultural
influence here. What dishonored others or was unbecoming a century ago may not
be now. So let’s ignore the examples and generalize. Love does not seek to make
the lover look good and the other look bad. It doesn’t embarrass, humiliate, or
shame. Too many people think we should call others names, belittle, demean, and
shame those who don’t live the way they dictate. There are cultures in which
this is considered normal and appropriate, but Scripture disagrees.
This
sort of behavior has a name in logic. It’s the ad hominem fallacy. It involves
attacking the person rather than discussing the issue. It can run in either direction-
“You’re______ if you do X.” Or “Because you do/think X, you’re
______.” Here’s the problem. If you are stupid and claim that 2+2=4, that doesn’t
mean that 2+2 equals something other than 4. You’re not wrong just because you’re
stupid. You could be stupid and be right. So the attack on your intelligence is
not a proof that what you’ve said is
wrong.
Love is
not self-seeking. Just as love doesn’t turn the spotlight on others to make
them feel or seem bad, love also does not turn the spotlight on the lover to
make them feel superior or good. This is one of the things gas lighters do.
Love is
not easily angered. There are two self-justifications involved with anger. The
first is that “It’s not my fault. _____ made me angry.” So, that person
has control of you. You can’t do other than what he/she says? The other is, ”I
have a right to be angry.” Yes, you have a right to be angry. But must you? Is
it the best option available? Just because you have a right doesn’t mean you
have no choice but to exercise that right. You don’t have to own a gun just because you
have a right to do so.
Love keeps no record of wrongs. This rejects a common attack in bad arguments: “You always/never ___.” Love forgives. That doesn’t mean actions don't have consequences. It means that we don't choose to continue the cycle of hatred.
Comments
Post a Comment