Skip to main content

Tree of Life

             And the Lord God said, “The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil. He must not be allowed to reach out his hand and take also from the tree of life and eat, and live forever.” So the Lord God banished him from the Garden of Eden to work the ground from which he had been taken. (Genesis 3:22-23)

down the middle of the great street of the city. On each side of the river stood the tree of life, bearing twelve crops of fruit, yielding its fruit every month. And the leaves of the tree are for the healing of the nations. (Revelation 22:2)

You probably thought you were safe from Genesis. So did I, and I specifically hoped to be safe from this topic. It has bothered me for years. Scripture seems to say that if Adam and Eve had not sinned, they would not have died. So, had they not sinned, the Tree of Life would have been superfluous. In Revelation, we see the Tree of Life in a place where everyone already has eternal life. The Tree of Life is superfluous.  Once Adam and Eve sinned, they were kicked out of Eden so they couldn’t eat of the tree and live forever (in their sinful state.) So, the Tree of Life was superfluous. Put bluntly, I don’t get it. It makes no sense! I told some friends yesterday morning that this is one of those questions that I plan to ask God when I get to heaven.

Perhaps He has taken pity on me and isn’t making me wait that long. We aren’t explicitly told this, but it’s evident from the context. The Tree of Life was the solution to death. The Tree of Life was there before Adam and Eve sinned, and it will continue to be there after sin is no longer an issue. That’s because the answer to the problem of death was and always will be there (here?), whether it’s needed or not.

If Adam and Eve had run to God after having sinned, God could have opened the medicine cabinet and taken out the tincture of the Tree of Life. It was there. It was available. They may not have known it, but if they had trusted God and gone to Him, the treatment for their ailment was ready. God’s solution was, is, and will always be there.

But they didn’t go to God. They sought their own solution. Even when God confronted them, they rejected His solution. They chose clothing even though nakedness wasn’t the real problem. They chose to shift the blame. There comes a time when the solution is taken away, lest it be applied or used in a way that does more harm than good. As a gift from God, it was a cure. It would have been harmful as something they (thought they) appropriated to themselves.

But that doesn’t mean it wasn’t available even before we needed it. Please – tell me where I’m off base  - or not. Tell me I’m crazy – or not. I think I finally have the answer. It may be an answer someone else has given, but they didn’t explain it in a way my mind could grasp at the time. Does it make sense? Does it fit Scripture?

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Especially to those who belong to the family of believers."

Therefore, as we have opportunity, let us do good to all people, especially to those who belong to the family of believers. (Gal 6:10)   “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another.   By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.” (John 13:34-35)           Joshua grinned when he saw Rex standing by the door, studying something on the ground. "Hey, man! Are we ready to do this thing?"          Rex looked up. "Josh, I can't do it. We're still best buds, but I can't stand your fiancée."           I've met "Rex" many times. I've been Rex. Joshua (Jesus) loves the Church. He's not a fool. He knows the Church is far from perfect, but she is His chosen bride. The Rexes of this world, who think themselves His friend, turn away from her. "You don't need the Church to...

Ssssssubmmissssssionnn

Submit to one another out of reverence for Christ . (Ephesians 5:21)             "Ssssssubmmisssssssionnn." Can't you just hear the serpent hissing this most horrible of words? If you listen to the serpent or the world, submission means groveling, allowing yourself to be abused, denying yourself your own humanity. Nothing could be worse than submission, could it?             Submission has never been a problem for me, as long as things are going the way I want them to. The rest of the time? Well, let's just say that while I don't know how to fight physically, I don't know how to not fight mentally. One of the fights I've been having with myself for years is about submission.             My first breakthrough took place on a trip to a bookstore. As I walked into the store, my thoughts were very clear. 1) I was goi...

Shark Fins, Triple Dog Dares, Heroes, Villains and Sidekicks

Two are better than one, because they have a good return for their work: If one falls down, his friend can help him up. But pity the man who falls and has no one to help him up! Also, if two lie down together, they will keep warm. But how can one keep warm alone? Though one may be overpowered, two can defend themselves. A cord of three strands is not quickly broken (Ecclesiastes 4:9-12)            There's a scene in Jaws in which someone sees a shark fin and starts a panic. As   all the swimmers scramble to shore, boats surround the fin, which falls over to reveal two kids. With several guns pointed at them, one of the kids points at the other. The message is clear: it was his idea. In Christmas Story, there's a scene in which one kid "triple dog dares" another to do something stupid. Since it's a triple dog dare, well, what choice does the boy have? There doesn't seem to be any end to the trouble that peer pressure can cause. ...